Thursday, November 19, 2009

Socio-logic with James - FBi Radio (19 Nov 2009): feminism and slavery

Hey everyone


The last couple of weeks have been crazy so I have not had a chance to post my blog with the usual enthusiasm, but I am back this week.


This week on FBI Radio (94.5 fm), I covered 2 broad areas: feminism (yes, the ‘f’-word) and modern day slavery.


The feminism story was inspired from the news the week before of the some of the degrading rituals that some Sydney Uni residential colleges follow. Alex and I discussed this on air but alas, no blog. For a great read, however, check out the article by Carina Garland.


So let’s look at this week’s issues...



Is Feminism still relevant?


For some background on gender, sex and feminism check out my blog below.


To begin with, we should understand that feminism simply means the push for political, cultural or economic rights and legal protection for women. (See, it is not a scary word!)


We can look at the challenges facing women both in Australia and internationally. These are different challenges and should not be simply grouped together. What is important however, is that challenges still on exist both on the economic and social front (again, see below for some evidence I provide) as well as check out the figures provided by the Australian Human Rights Commission.


Feminism is about confronting these challenges with the goal of equality: and I think remains relevant today though the challenges, in Australia, have changed.


I call myself a feminist – and believe that it is just as relevant today as ever.



Modern day slavery


Slavery ‘officially ended over 200 years ago, but unfortunately, it persists today. Though exact figures are almost impossible to come by, it is estimated that that there are 27 million people around the world today are being held in slavery. To think about the size of that, it is the Australian population plus another 7 million! Figures indicate that this illegal industry generates up to US$100 billion per year.


One organisation working to stop slavery is Free the Slaves, which was founded in 2001 as well as its UK sister organisation Anti-Slavery International (which is the world's oldest human rights group).


Slavery is essentially the ownership of a person: they become like any other commodity (like a pair of shoes: unfortunate example, but this is something that we need to be brutally honest about).


Free the Slaves draws an important distinction between slavery and extremely exploitative labour, though they also admit that this is a very thin line.


Sweatshop workers are exploited by being forced to work long hours under difficult and abusive conditions with little pay. Slaves face the same conditions, but additionally they cannot walk away – having lost all their rights and free will.


Further, most slaves are paid nothing at all, and the physical and psychological violence used against them is so complete that they cannot escape their slavery.


Both Free the Slave and organisations like Oxfam Australia and also many organisations like Apheda which are associated with labour unions work on these issues.


What is important here is that we can all do something about this – our everyday actions can break down slavery and overcome sweatshop conditions.


Follow the hot-links to find out how you can help (as well as get more information).


Cheers, james

1 comment:

Paolo Scimone said...

I'd like to ask a question James. The countries where slavery is pretty rife, are still slavery-illegal countries, yes? I can guess the circumstances but I'd prefer to hear some of the stats from you please.

I'll read the rest of your feminism/gender blog first, but I will state that of course feminism is important. We've been living in a patriarchal society for a few thousand years, so even when we get full equality in society, the watchdog mentality needs to remain alert.

I would think that feminism comes under the banner of humanitarianism, but for the historical reasons mentioned above, it should probably remain under its own grouping. It's the principles that are important in the end and they'll emerge, regardless of the banner they fly under.

I personally would prefer if we had about 70 percent of women representing us in politics, so that women would be able to restructure a certain patriarchal sentiment which is prevalent in modern day politics... 50/50 probably wouldn't accomplish much.

The representation of women in fields of humanities and social services, in my opinion, validates such a 70/30 female/male representation.